The update is now available at the ACube Systems online shop.

@dooz @sailor

Great, thanks for the test and the information. I had asked about this before but it wasn't answered.

https://www.amigans.net/modules/newbb/ ... id=148528#forumpost148528

It seems that a 4GB SoDIMM with 1333Mhz would be a good choice. Can AmigaOs4.1 access 4/8 GB of memory at all or is the maximum usage 2GB?

Quote:

Thanks for testing. You can use DDR3L memory on DDR3 slot. But DDR3 memory in DDR3L motherboard not works. DDR3L memory stick are dual voltage. Dell article.

I tested Kingston 8GB DDRL KF318LS11IB/8 and it works fine, results are similar like your 4GB module:

The licence code I received for my A1222 only seems to have Personal Paint and ImageFX Studio show up as purchased items on the Updater tool. They don't appear on AmiStore as items I own.

I haven't purchased the Enhancer software in the past.

Kind regards,

Francis

@kerravonQuote:
It took the whole day but it is now working, source and executables are published already.

I tested several kinds of DDR3 in A1222. I also done also speed test to see if there is some diference. I was suprised that one module gives better performance. Test was done with SPE compiled STREAM benchmark that is on Aminet/OS4depot (stream-5.10-AOS).

I tested two kind of 1333 MHz and one 1066 MHz. All worked ok.

GoldenMars GMB20028SOX829-1333 MHz 2GB DDR3:
Function Best Rate MB/s Avg time Min time Max time
Copy: 853.5 0.190645 0.187454 0.205199
Scale: 530.4 0.314437 0.301685 0.333246
Add: 608.5 0.406054 0.394389 0.417909
Triad: 579.4 0.423509 0.414206 0.437765

KINGMAX FSFF65F-D6KQ9 BEE 1333 MHz 4 GB DDR3:
Function Best Rate MB/s Avg time Min time Max time
Copy: 787.8 0.208007 0.203093 0.217850
Scale: 479.9 0.340636 0.333376 0.346968
Add: 568.6 0.430306 0.422055 0.441371
Triad: 550.5 0.449238 0.435952 0.468612

KINGSTOM KVR1066D3S7/1G 1066 MHz 1 GB DDR3:
Function Best Rate MB/s Avg time Min time Max time
Copy: 859.0 0.189459 0.186271 0.195421
Scale: 557.1 0.296775 0.287192 0.304756
Add: 635.8 0.386305 0.377477 0.397208
Triad: 598.6 0.406753 0.400919 0.418826

So not every DDR3 gives the same speed on A1222. All DDR3 I tested are 1.5V.

I *didnt tested* 1600 MHz because the ones I have are *DDR3L* declared as 1.35V. DDR3 is usually 1.5V. Both are pin compatible but I simply didnt want to test that to avoid possible problems or to damaged board. Cant find any info that A1222 is compatible with DDR3L - maybe someone else can confirm?

Also other test results and compatibility reports from other A1222s out there are also usefull. DDR3 SoDIMM can be found in old PC laptops.

-dooz

@MartinW

Now I see on your video , you build from makefiles.aos4*.
I didn't do it that way. I did with cmake directly.
build libgit2 in the first place
you have the declarations in makefile.aos4
then build simplegit

@MartinW

Almost there mate!!!!

Looks it fails to build LhA.
Can't LHASA (apt install lhasa) be used instead and just "remove" the LhA build part.

maybe in the docker LhA command exists ¿:-/

Example here :

10.Workbench:> version smartfilesystem full
SmartFilesystem 1.293 (19/11/2015)
AmigaOS4 PPC A-EON Technology Ltd

@dfstudios

Since the Enhancer software 2.2 is bundled with the A1222plus, shouldn't there be an associated registration with name and password so that Amistore/Updater recognizes that it's a purchased version?

My new device hasn't arrived yet, so unfortunately I can't check yet.

I'm also not sure how it will behave if you have already purchased Enhancer Software 2.2 as in my case, probably only my registration details will be required.

@Hypex

It is bundled with A1222+ (as it is with X5000).

I don't know how the links are done between AmiStore and those bundled Enhancer Software Packs.

@dfstudios

I can only speak from the experience of my X1000 but I would say yes. I bought a digital copy through AmiStore and it shows up on my account. Naturally I have to log in and I told it to save the log in. When I check my purchases I have to make sure it's logged in. I can also download from AmiStore.

When I run Updater the Enhancer components show.

How was your digital copy issued? Through a dealer? Unless you bought it direct in AmiStore it may depend on digital copy being registered somehow.

That looks a lot like the format of git pack files has changed. Which, let's face it wouldn't be a massive surprise! So compiling would be a great first step as it would allow us to dig into it.

I've just spent another half an hour looking at the build and it's failing massively on building LHA from old sources from around the year 2000. Not sure why it's trying to do that but I guess there's a reason for it. I can only surmise that there's something different about whatever cross compiler setup the original build used vs the docker cross compiler image. I might look into that I suppose.

Hi there,

I'm not sure if I'm missing something here. I have the A1222+ with a digital copy of the Enhancer 2.2 software, but AmiStore doesn't recognise that I have this and wants to charge for it and the Updater tool doesn't show it under the My Purchases tab. I can see that there are some updates available, but the Updater tool says that they are not enabled for download on my account.

Should I be able to see the Enhancer 2.2 on my account and download updates?

Kind regards,

Francis

@MamePPCA1
@smf

There is a typo in the command ...

should be ....

version SmartFileSystem full


Regards,
redfox

@davec555 @MartinW

I will comfort you or sadden you ... and yes sgit will not work.
As I wrote earlier I did a quick compilation test.
I checked my sources but ... my mistake was that I did not check what @Raziel wrote
https://www.amigans.net/modules/newbb/ ... id=145316#forumpost145316

The fact that the program compiles is not everything. It's not a problem with SSL, it's a problem with the old libgit2 library.
It overruns the right ranges and therefore does not work. Who will fix it? I do not know
I hope I am wrong and @billyfish finds a solution and refutes my thinking

@AmigaOldie

Some CDs can deteriorate over time, although it could be a combination of factors such as the lens alignment or laser quality of the drive. As you have a system that is able to read the discs, it might be worthwhile doing a 1:1 copy of them to new good quality discs (I'd recommend Verbatim CD-Rs).

Or, you could create an ISO image of the CDs and use DiskImage to mount it on the A1222, which is probably easier.

Kind regards,

Francis

@smf

I typed what sou say and it said:

"VERSION: object not found"

Even with "smartfilesystem" as lowercase

@joerg
I was told that the first hook (Even wasn't called callhook, but some older initial version) was the one which is used internally in the utility.library, for the string gadget. And it was in Alpha 15 of AOS2 (~1.4 somewhere in ks 35.xx). Prior to that, there wasn't any hooks usage inside the amigaos at all (in any function). I.e., no amigaos prior 1.4 have inside internally any hooking functionality of any sort, just direct usage of function and pointers, etc. By date it was in 8 june 1989. So it was first time of first hook internal (!) usage in utility.library, not even user-allowed code was. And it was Alpha of amigaos2 (So wasn't released anything prior with giving hooking functionality).

Then after 6 months, in the same "internal" code changes, in the beta1 of amigaos2.0, they made CallHookPkt(). So, fresh function, all fine, nothing released to anyone (except maybe this "beta of os2, named 1.4 for a3000). And then, in amiga.lib v37 (i do not know date exactly, and dunno what ks it was with it), then created CallHook/A in.

Taking into account that internally only utility.library use it (and when it use it, it wasn't called callhook, but just some internal name) , and that they have utility.library with callhookpkt already, i fail to see why they create CallHook/A.

I mean, it didn't looks like for support OS1.x, because not internally, not externaly hooking vere done for OS1.x. Maybe issues was all this C compilers (and maybe assembler ones?) asking for things to be on stack, so to make live of assembler programmers easy or something ? There should be another reasson, i just want to understand what one :) To fully fill the whole historical picture in OS3, before further annoying everyone about OS4 :))

@smf

Yes