Who's Online |
236 user(s) are online ( 138 user(s) are browsing Forums)
Members: 1
Guests: 235
jarokuczi,
more...
|
|
Headlines |
-
aurafly.lha - audio/misc
Feb 16, 2026
-
amiarcadia.lha - emulation/gamesystem
Feb 16, 2026
-
amigadiskbench.lha - utility/benchmark
Feb 16, 2026
-
autodocviewer.lha - development/utility
Feb 12, 2026
-
libsdl3_mixer.lha - development/library/audio
Feb 11, 2026
-
iconecta.lha - network/misc
Feb 11, 2026
-
yt.lha - video/misc
Feb 11, 2026
-
rave.lha - audio/edit
Feb 8, 2026
-
libxmp.lha - development/library/audio
Feb 8, 2026
-
videovortex.lha - video/play
Feb 8, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
Re: NEW AMIGA BOOK: Bootblock Rebels - The Hidden Stars of the Amiga Underground
|
|
Amigans Defender 
|
Congratulations on funding the book!
This being said, we don't need two separate topic threads on the same thing, so the other one has been removed. Please use this thread to post more information about the project.
|
The Rear Window blog AmigaOne X5000 @ 2GHz / 4GB RAM / Radeon RX 560 / ESI Juli@ / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition SAM440ep-flex @ 667MHz / 1GB RAM / Radeon 9250 / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
|
Amigans Defender 
|
I don't care.. All other OSes have moved from roots using sandboxes and something like that. Only OS4 doesn't want to grow and stay rooted to the past because 3-4 software people is using and there are no alternatives. So you have an ancient OS, with ancient software and no new users, no new developers.. But hey! You can use ArtEffect that modern people can use in a browser...
|
i'm really tired...
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
|
Not too shy to talk 
|
@afxgroup I think you're alone now
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
|
Just popping in 
|
As stated, a sandbox for 68k OS friendly software is the way to go. All legacy components should be removed from the OS4 source code.
Another possible path could be to build a spin-off of the current OS4 state, redesigned with cleanups and architectural improvements to make the best possible use of modern hardware.
My two cents.
|
|
Memento audere semper!
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
|
Just popping in 
|
I think I agree with the majority of folks here. If we lose 68K support, we will lose part of the Magic of OS 4. For my money, I would push harder to have better integration and support for older software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 22:29
#6
|
Just popping in 
|
If I'll lost 68k compatibility layer I'll lost 60% of software I use with my NG system. If OS4 lost 68K compatibility and left posibility of use older apps exclusive to use of UAE It's not very diferent to use Linux, Mac or PC with UAE.
As Kas1e say, really we no need use Petunia an compatibility layer of libs if a new sandbox can do the work and it's transparent or invisible to user and corrected integrated in the system can be done too.
|
|
X5040 - 4 Gb ram - Radeon RX 550 POLARIS 12.
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 21:52
#7
|
Quite a regular 
|
Please forgive this nostalgic journey ...
My first Amiga was an A2000HD with Workbench 1.3 and a generous suite of software. I upgraded to AmigaOS 3.1 and added some more RAM, CD-ROM drive and flicker-fixer card. I did not have an accelerator card, so all my software was compatible with 68000 CPU, including Final Writer 97.
My next Amiga was my MicroA1 with AmigaOS 4.0 Developer Pre-release software. I purchased a motherboard bundled with OS4 and received the motherboard and a white CD-R containing OS4. I think it was the first update that officially supported the MicroA1. After many enquiries and many months of waiting, I finally received my official AmigaOS 4.0 Pre-release CD and I was able to register with Hyperion and receive the next software update.
By that time, I had been using OS4 for many months and I was transfering software from my old A2000HD to my MicroA1. Most system friendly software worked just fine with OS4, however, I needed to use E-UAE for some of my old favourites (Appetizer suite, Microfiche filer and Amiga Vision).
I was also collecting some other 68K software, such as TVPaint, PPaint, Imagine and Real3D.
As the years passsed, more PPC compatible software became available and I now have a mixture of 68K and PPC software.
-----
So, back to the 68K compatibility issue ...
If it is so important to get rid of 68K compatibility, why not just bite the bullet and produce your new OS with no compatibility whatsoever. Call it XYZLinux with a nostalgic "Amiga" skin on the desktop. While you're at it, migrate to some other processor and let PPC and 68K rest in peace. Just let us know ahead of time so we can decide if we want to join your journey.
--- redfox
Edited by redfox on 2026/2/18 5:20:12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: NEW AMIGA BOOK: Bootblock Rebels - The Hidden Stars of the Amiga Underground
|
Posted on: Yesterday 20:31
#8
|
Just popping in 
|
The campaign has reached 100% funding based on €22,000 pledged! Thanks to everyone who helped make this happen.
New pledges are being accepted until March 15, 2026 so please contribute to get your own copy of the book:
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bitman/bootblock-rebels
The author has introduced two stretch goals:
€24,000 - Galahad chapter The planned section on tools, methods, and copy protections will be expanded into a full extra chapter added to the book. It will be written by Galahad, a long-time Amiga programmer known for game enhancements and deep technical insight - and it will include screenshots and real examples.
€30,000 - Amiga intro When the book is ready, an Amiga “game intro” will be released. The intro is built from an original intro source most sceners will recognize, a classic used in many "game intros". It will include a greetings scroller with backer names. It will be added to YouTube & uploaded to the major demoscene repositories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 19:25
#9
|
Home away from home 
|
@FlynnTheAvatar I mean to remove everything 68k from os4 internals, yes. API can be left as it, just added new os4 specific (as it happens right now), but to ditch everything from internals, but sandbox 68k properly so everything will runs like it now, and users will not notice. And sure there mean just only os4 apps, without matain os3/morphos/aros with same code, it always was a mess with big projects, and .. and it all same old stories :) That just can't be done for today properly with current developer resources.
Main point that for users it still all of course should be same, just internaly a bit more sandboxing. But as i say this all just cheap talks, because in reality it all will be like this is now, with some new things added on top and bug fixing. Such radical changes probably will have no place ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 16:57
#10
|
Just popping in 
|
If I understand you correctly, you mean ditching old 68k stuff from the APIs/libraries. IMHO this is even worse, because this makes maintaining software for all Amiga flavors (3.x, MorphOS, AmigaOS 4.x) much more compliate than it needs to. And it is pretty bad with the interfaces for libraries calls already.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 16:38
#11
|
Home away from home 
|
Probably what it mean originaly and what mean Andrea is to ditch 68k from OS internals and co, but of course, keeping some sort of emulation/sandboxing integrated well or whatever. No one saying that 68k should be no more runs on os4, but not in a way it happens now internally. Just internally it should be different, and visually the same as now.
But, we all know this probably will not happen because of too much work need it to make it all allright
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 15:12
#12
|
Just popping in 
|
AmigaOS back compatibility is very important for me at least for system friendly apps and tools. In 68k we have lot of apps and tools never replaced by equivalen in PPC like Adpro, ImageFX, Art Effects, WCS, Vista Pro, etc..
Furthermore, I think that compatibility should be improved even further. Some app with PPC support for PowerUp libs not works with actual AmigaOS4.1 like Imagine 3D PPC, Tornado3D, ImageFx PPC modules, etc.. only some WarpOS apps but not old PowerUp.
Classic emulation modes of EHB, HAM, 256c should be updated for works with modern GFX cards ( actually show bad colors ) and add a lowres with doubled pixels be necesary. Updated Petunia with better JIT are welcome too.
I not want a new system without compatibility with old 68k apps. I love contiue using my old Amiga apps in my AmigaNG at fast speed of Petunia.
|
|
X5040 - 4 Gb ram - Radeon RX 550 POLARIS 12.
|
|
|
|
Re: auraFly got an update
|
Posted on: Yesterday 12:22
#13
|
Site Builder 
|
@AMIGASYSTEM Thank you for letting me know. The app should be tested only on 32bit Aros systems. I will investigate more if I can make it work better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 10:44
#14
|
Home away from home 
|
@FlynnTheAvatar Quote: VinCED (because CON is seriously buggy) clearly, we need better debug tools. I’m working on something.
|
|
(NutsAboutAmiga)
Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps.
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 10:36
#15
|
Quite a regular 
|
Quote: FlynnTheAvatar wrote:Sorry, I do not see the benefit of having an "Amiga NG" with an "Amiga OS" that does not support 68k programs.
I personally use a lot of 68k programs that have no PPC port: - CubicIDE - ArtEffect - StormC 4 - IMP3 - AmIRC - VinCED (because CON is seriously buggy) You are right, I forgot CubicIDE. I am using it too, but more often I am using Lite-XL. It is not IDE, but is very useful. I also ordered StormC5ED.
Edited by sailor on 2026/2/17 12:42:41
|
|
AmigaOS3: Amiga 1200 AmigaOS4: Micro A1-C, AmigaOne XE, Pegasos II, Sam440ep, Sam440ep-flex, AmigaOne X1000 MorphOS: Efika 5200b, Pegasos I, Pegasos II, Powerbook, Mac Mini, iMac, Powermac Quad
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 10:25
#16
|
Just popping in 
|
Sorry, I do not see the benefit of having an "Amiga NG" with an "Amiga OS" that does not support 68k programs.
I personally use a lot of 68k programs that have no PPC port: - CubicIDE - ArtEffect - StormC 4 - IMP3 - AmIRC - VinCED (because CON is seriously buggy)
And no, running them in UAE is not an option for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: Yesterday 7:39
#17
|
Quite a regular 
|
Quote: redfox wrote:Software compatibility with 68K software was the main reason I purchased my OS4 system way back in 2004. My reason to buy AmigaNG was need for more power, my last Amiga - A4000T with CyberstormPPC was simply too slow for daily work. In 2003 I purchased Pegasos 2 with MorphOS and in 2013 AmigaOne X1000 with AmigaOS4. I have never regretted it. I used them for daily work many years. All old great 68k games I am running with E-UAE. The only 68k application I am using often is NetFS on AmigaOS4. Morphos NetFS is native, so I don't need it here. Compatibility with 68k application was great in time of MorphOS 1.3, where was no native network stack. But today it is practically not needed. Of course, compatibility with system friendly 68k app is not bad. More important for me is to have near-modern web browser, IMAP email client, Excel/Calc and Word/Writer compatible apps. And multicore would be useful. That's enough for it to be my daily work system. 
|
|
AmigaOS3: Amiga 1200 AmigaOS4: Micro A1-C, AmigaOne XE, Pegasos II, Sam440ep, Sam440ep-flex, AmigaOne X1000 MorphOS: Efika 5200b, Pegasos I, Pegasos II, Powerbook, Mac Mini, iMac, Powermac Quad
|
|
|
|
Re: Decreasing compatiblitiy of OS4 a good thing?
|
Posted on: 2/16 23:29
#18
|
Quite a regular 
|
Software compatibility with 68K software was the main reason I purchased my OS4 system way back in 2004. It allows me to run Final Writer 97, TVPaint, PPaint and ARexx. Some of my other software only works under emulation with E-UAE running on OS4.
So I have a few questions ...
If we get rid of 68K compatibility, where are the software products that will replace our old favourites?
Are there actually programmers willing to do the work?
I am not a developer or a beta tester. I'm just a regular user.
Here is a snapshot of the software I use most on OS4:
NotePad Multiview Final Writer 97 IgnitionOS4 spreadsheet TVPaint PPaint AmiDVD IBrowse Web Browser NetSurf Web Browser Odyssey Web Browser Soliton MUI-based card game Many ARexx based scripts and programs
--- redfox MicroA1 AmigaOS 4.1 FE Update 3 Enhancer Software Core Edition
I purchased Enhancer Software V1.5 and Enhancer Software V2.2 but currently have installed only Enhancer Core, AmiDVD, SmartFileSystem v1.293 and diskcache.library.
Edited by redfox on 2026/2/17 0:00:57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: X5000 Uboot variable for displaying different boot partitions
|
Posted on: 2/16 23:02
#19
|
Just can't stay away 
|
@johnfante
Great that we succeded in finding it!
Best regards,
Niels
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: clean way howto use clib4
|
Posted on: 2/16 19:54
#20
|
Amigans Defender 
|
@sailor
Thank you for using it. Any feedback (and help..) is always appreciated
|
i'm really tired...
|
|
|
|