Who's Online |
219 user(s) are online ( 98 user(s) are browsing Forums)
Members: 1
Guests: 218
Hans,
more...
|
|
|
|
Re: Hi from Pianeta Amiga!
|
Posted on: 2007/9/27 5:44
#132741
|
Not too shy to talk ![Not too shy to talk](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e94a6f72.gif)
|
@Swoop
So I guess it's perfectly OK to threaten someone's life so long as you think they caused you some delay in your instant gratification of new hardware, right? I guess it's perfectly OK to hammer, hammer, hammer, hammer at the one YOU want to hold responsible even though there's NO evidence that they actually are responsible, right?
Oh! That's just so balanced of you! NOT!!!
|
|
|
|
Re: Hi from Pianeta Amiga!
|
Posted on: 2007/9/27 3:47
#132742
|
Quite a regular ![Quite a regular](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e9e7d88d.gif)
|
@Billsey Quote: So, why is it that we must blame Amiga, Inc. again? Is it because they own the IP and actually want to paid for it? Sure, Amiga Inc. filed the lawsuit, but it is Hyperion who were refusing to release a final product (even tacking stuff on from the 4.1, 4.x, etc. feature lists in order to keep going without releasing a final product) until Amiga, Inc. confronted Hyperion with Hyperion's actions and gave notice that the contract was null and void because of Hyperion's actions. Why does the owner of the IP get blamed while the company that held it hostage for all these years gets to skate? There's plenty of blame to go around for everybody involved, so try to be a little bit balanced.
EDIT: I mean come on! I was just on the IRC channel and people are suggesting that a gun be mailed to Bill McEwen with a note suggesting that he use it on himself! This goes entirely too far! Bill McEwen is not to blame, and even if he was, such actions would constitute felony offenses in most countries!
Balance yourselves! Please! Wow!! That's a realy balanced take on the situation....NOT.
|
|
|
|
OS installation under E-UAE
|
Posted on: 2007/9/27 0:40
#132743
|
Not too shy to talk ![Not too shy to talk](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e94a6f72.gif)
|
Installed 2.04 to a disk partition in E-UAE, but E-UAE is not able to boot with it. Shouldn't it be able to?
|
Valiant@ CamelotAmigaOne XE, 800Mhz, 1GB, 9250 Radeon, OS4.1u7 Sam440ep, 666Mhz, 512Mb, 9250 Radeon, OS4.1u6 A1-X1000, 1.8Ghz, 1GB, 9250 Radeon, OS4.1x A1-X5000/40 2.2Ghz, 2GB, Radeon HD 7700, OS4.1 FE ud 2
|
|
|
Re: HELP Need to run DosBox or BOCHS
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 21:07
#132744
|
Quite a regular ![Quite a regular](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e9e7d88d.gif)
|
@TetiSoft
Murakami say it but it isn't the real important thing. Back to the question,what are the steps I have to do to configure BOCHS and how about DosBox?
I dream to convert my Amiga on a PC with emulation even if it is too slow.
BOCHS is my choice,but I don't despise DosBox either.
|
|
|
|
Google Vulnerabilities
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 19:34
#132745
|
Not too shy to talk ![Not too shy to talk](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e94a6f72.gif)
|
Story here. WARNING!If you are logged into Google services while you are reading the story do not click any links!
|
|
|
|
Re: MozAmiga
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 19:21
#132746
|
Just can't stay away ![Just can't stay away](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8ea81e642.gif)
|
Hi @Alkaron
The AmigaDE is what Amiga wants people to program to, and with good reason: programs written for the Amiga DE run hosted through Amiga OS 4.0, as well as Windows and Linux, both Linux-based and Windows CE-based PDA devices. Applications written to the Amiga OS, by contrast, run only on that operating system.
It's wishful thinking!
|
|
|
|
Re: MozAmiga
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 17:42
#132747
|
Home away from home ![Home away from home](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8eb1a72e7.gif)
|
@Alkaron Quote: Hage is working on OS4.0 and what Huh? Care to elaborate? Who or what is a "Hage"? What is he/she/it working on?
|
|
|
|
Re: MozAmiga
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 17:08
#132748
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
@Alkaron
Amiga Inc. has Amiga in ... and they kiss PC in ...
We could see WHAT they did for Ami last 5-6 years NOTHING. NOTHING.
Hage is working on OS4.0 and what... Amiga Inc. is doing...
Firefox for Ami would be great, native for OS4.0 this is my dream. Maybe filezila and mail.... ehh :D.
kreciu
|
|
|
|
Re: Sam440ep "The Red One"
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 17:03
#132749
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
@BillE
You all are right ;).
First think off all is OPERATING SYSTEM, there are tons of "fun" hardware but... even if I could buy a Sam440 I can install (not stable) Linux... which I can do on 5 year old PC...
IF SOMEONE ALLOW ME TO USE OS4.0 (which is ready to go but Amiga Inc... kiss ass to PC users so they DON'T want support Amiga... any more. Go and see AMAZING programs which you can buy from amiga.com...).
I would like to see OS4.0 for Amiga "classic" with PPC (we have it NOW), Amiga ONE (it's there to), Sam440 (suppose to be there) AND Pegasos... yes, pegasos since there is a LOT people using this mobo... unify our people for ONE system, no more divisions :).
And than good programs, we have SOME good one but we need more (I can pay, I pay for PC progrmas why not for programs for AMI???).
There are some programs which we HAVE to have to use today computers.
Sam440 looks for me great (efika is good to but...).
GIVE ME A OS4.0 and SPUTNIK = kreciu is happy. The rest will come in time :).
Ehh, I know that I will wait for this next year, but I used to it...
Kreciu
PS. Now I'm building my A1200/Ebox/Mediator/Voodoo2200/SB128/040.33/32RAM/4xEide.... I'm looking for PPC? But to find it is a miracle... or price is killing...
Ehhh... ;)
|
|
|
|
Re: Basilisk 2
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 16:18
#132750
|
Home away from home ![Home away from home](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8eb1a72e7.gif)
|
@Gazelle Quote: FYI: the byte order is reverse between big and little endian modes (not the word order). ARGB (BE) and BGRA (LE) is constructed formats, while GBAR is what you get when you having (BE) and (LE) problems, Int32 the words are in revere order. Int16 the bytes the bytes are reverse order. Bytes are the same in Intel and Motorola format.
|
(NutsAboutAmiga)
Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps.
|
|
|
Re: HELP Need to run DosBox or BOCHS
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 15:55
#132751
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
@MamePPCA1 Quote: How much slow is BOCHS on an Amiga One 800 Mhz in number per cent statistics comparing to a real PC?
Its of course magnitudes faster than the only existing "real PC" which had an Intel 8086 (or was it 8088) CPU. Sorry, could not resist. On a x86 CPU you can in theory run a PC OS on the hardware and on BOCHS and you'll get a percentage number. On a PPC CPU you cant run the PC OS on the hardware ergo you have nothing for comparison to get a reasonable percentage number. Oh, BTW: Quote: I have OS 4.0 update 4 and I see it is better than Final for DosBox emulation.
Could you tell some details? Whats wrong with OS4Final plus July Update?
|
|
|
|
Re: Basilisk 2
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 15:43
#132752
|
Quite a regular ![Quite a regular](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e9e7d88d.gif)
|
@Gazelle
GBAR is a perfectly valid pixel format, though you are right this is not the standard LE mode we are used to which would normally be BGRA...
|
Back to a quiet home... At last
|
|
|
myX11setup?????????????
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 15:31
#132753
|
Quite a regular ![Quite a regular](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e9e7d88d.gif)
|
I was just looking through Amiga future 68, and re-read page#23 "Test: myX11Setup". I wondered if there was any news on this, and there is a mention of Cycnix-pre4. These were mentioned to be released by the magazines publication date, but I can't locate them todate. ![](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/smil3dbd4d75edb5e.gif)
|
|
|
|
Re: HELP Need to run DosBox or BOCHS
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 15:14
#132754
|
Quite a regular ![Quite a regular](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e9e7d88d.gif)
|
@Murakami
I have OS 4.0 update 4 and I see it is better than Final for DosBox emulation.
How much slow is BOCHS on an Amiga One 800 Mhz in number per cent statistics comparing to a real PC?
What options may I introduce in DosBox to happily run it on my Amiga?
|
|
|
|
Re: Basilisk 2
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 12:12
#132755
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
@LiveForIt Quote: LiveForIt wrote: Well that?s how ARGB PowerPC / MC680X0 format looks in Intel format,
Sorry but that's not true. ARGB (BE) is BGRA (LE) and both modes are supported by picasso96. Take a look at --color formats-- in the Picasso96API.doc FYI: the byte order is reverse between big and little endian modes (not the word order).
|
|
|
|
Re: Basilisk 2
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 11:34
#132756
|
Home away from home ![Home away from home](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8eb1a72e7.gif)
|
@Hans
@Hans Well that?s how ARGB PowerPC / MC680X0 format looks in Intel format, I have tried optimizing a bit, but 32 bit is slower.
@Elwood I have tried writing my own Blit command, but it does not give and major effect.
@all Some good news, in 16bit it a lot faster, but no direct video.
A possibility for 16bit / 32bit direct video is to allocate memory page, then set the memory area as read only, set up fault handler, and implement some kind byte swap on write, I have no idea how fast this can be, I like do some experiments but its a big job to implement (I think).
Edited by LiveForIt on 2007/9/27 17:44:15
|
(NutsAboutAmiga)
Basilisk II for AmigaOS4 AmigaInputAnywhere Excalibur and other tools and apps.
|
|
|
Re: OS3.1 disk set for A4000T
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 10:15
#132757
|
Not too shy to talk ![Not too shy to talk](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8e94a6f72.gif)
|
@HammerD
Thanks for the response. I have a set of disks that were supplied with the A4000T but they had obviously been stored in a damp place as the disk surfaces are covered in mould. As you know three of the disks are the standard OS3.1 release but the other three (Install, Workbench and Extras) are specific to the A4000T.
As I have a set of disks, albeit faulty, and an A4000T I'm not too sure if there is a problem copying disks? Just a thought.
TrevorDick
|
AmigaOne X1000 betatester
|
|
|
Re: HELP Need to run DosBox or BOCHS
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 7:52
#132758
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
DosBox is very slow since the OS4 July Update. Is there any new tip to optimize its speed ?
|
|
|
|
Re: Make CD
|
Posted on: 2007/9/26 1:54
#132759
|
Just popping in ![Just popping in](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3e632f95e81ca.gif)
|
@samo79
..and it's not that user friendly as you might think.
I can think of atleast 5 burner programs on other platforms which have much better and user friendlier GUI. But FryingPan is more user friendly than MakeCD to the same extent than other platforms burner programs are to FryingPan.
For example why not steal the wizard system from Nero and implement a similar type to FryingPan. Simply choose Data, Video, Audio and subtypes and the GUI sets you up automatically. When you've added your files simply press burn and everything works.
This is quite ok in FryingPan but nowhere near as straight forward as in Nero.
|
Best Regards,
Harry
[SOLD] ?A1-C, 512MB, Antec Aria
|
|
|
Re: Make CD
|
Posted on: 2007/9/25 23:32
#132760
|
Home away from home ![Home away from home](https://www.amigans.net/uploads/rank3dbf8eb1a72e7.gif)
|
@jape
Maybe but FriyingPan is shareware ...
|
|
|
|