Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
100 user(s) are online (87 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 100

more...

Support us!

Headlines

 
  Register To Post  

(1) 2 3 4 ... 8 »
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@328gts
This is my configuration:
AmigaOne G4 - 2GB Ram
Radeon 9200 - 256MB

That's the ragemem result:

RAGEMEM v0.34 - compiled 11/02/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7441/7451 Vger 2.1 @ 800 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 6084 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2027 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1804 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1334 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 148 MB/Sec
WRITE: 607 MB/Sec
WRITE: 643 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 33 MB/Sec
WRITE: 161 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
Peg2@1.25Ghz

RAGEMEM v0.34 - compiled 11/02/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.1 @ 1266 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 9648 MB/Sec
WRITE: 3219 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2802 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2428 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 150 MB/Sec
WRITE: 392 MB/Sec
WRITE: 733 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
*CRASHES aka DSI and freezes after ignoring it*

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Sam440ep-flex

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 733 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5381 MB/Sec
WRITE: 5404 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 307 MB/Sec
WRITE: 181 MB/Sec
WRITE: 994 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 16 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
SAMep@533 using the onboard GFX.


RAGEMEM v0.34 - compiled 11/02/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 533 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 3752 MB/Sec
WRITE: 3789 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 259 MB/Sec
WRITE: 164 MB/Sec
WRITE: 881 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 15 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@Raziel

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1266 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 3793

---> L1 <---
READ32: 4820 MB/Sec
READ64: 9637 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 4131 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 3215 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ32: 2188 MB/Sec
READ64: 2846 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 1959 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 2357 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 185 MB/Sec
READ64: 193 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 302 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 654 MB/Sec
WRITE: 667 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec


edit: updated to 0.37


Edited by Raziel on 2010/11/6 12:24:50
Edited by Raziel on 2010/11/6 19:31:07
Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
I?m a litte bit curious how fast the ram- and videoram-access will be on the sam460ex with its pci-express and ddr2-ram?

I?m asking, because i want to buy the 460ex beside my sam440ep.

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Raziel

I tried 0.35 (both A and B) and the results were pretty much the same between them (A + B) and between 0.34. It didn't crash when it reached the vmem bench, but didn't return any results either. That's on a Peg2 as I said.

edit: I tried with 0.34 again without startup and it worked. So, here's the videomem results:

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 56 MB/Sec
WRITE: 184 MB/Sec

no results with new version even without startup


Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 14:59:37
Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 15:00:23
Edited by Vulture on 2010/11/5 15:01:22
Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
Here's my results:

RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: IBM PowerPC 750 CXe 2.4 @ 666 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5074 MB/Sec
WRITE: 3384 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1531 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1450 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 208 MB/Sec
WRITE: 123 MB/Sec
WRITE: 450 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 33 MB/Sec
WRITE: 100 MB/Sec

A1-SE, Sapphire Radeon 9200.

What's the difference between A and B programs ?

Rock lobster bit me - so I'm here forever
X1000 + AmigaOS 4.1 FE
"Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." - Seymour Cray
Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 9043 MB/Sec
WRITE: 8986 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1127 MB/Sec
WRITE: 725 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 305 MB/Sec
WRITE: 494 MB/Sec
WRITE: 956 MB/Sec (Tricky)

No results from the VIDEO BUS test

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@m3x

wow, this looks not bad!


My results:

RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 666 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5020 MB/Sec
WRITE: 334 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 276 MB/Sec
WRITE: 326 MB/Sec
WRITE: 891 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 15 MB/Sec
WRITE: 49 MB/Sec


Why is write nearly always faster than read?

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
Why do the SAM video bus benchmark look the pci bus is running at 33MHz?
I expect write speeds closer to the A1 or Peg2.

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
A1-XE with 7457 CPU running at 1066 MHz.

RAGEMEM v0.34 - compiled 11/02/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1066 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 8115 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2708 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2380 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2076 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 199 MB/Sec
WRITE: 751 MB/Sec
WRITE: 799 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 33 MB/Sec
WRITE: 162 MB/Sec


I do have an L3 cache on the CPU module, but I don't know how to enable it. I remember Alan Redhouse saying that it made hardly any difference. One of these days I must try it out.

cheers
tony
Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@m3x

Quote:

m3x wrote:
RAGEMEM v0.35 - compiled 11/05/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none


So, we have interesting results. Anyone with AOne X1000, Friedens?

CD32/A500/A600/A600+Furia/A1200/A4000D+A2320+PiccoloSD64/Sam440 flex 800MHz RAM 1GB HD7750 128MB OS4.1 SBLive! ->
Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Hi people!

Uploaded v0.36 on Os4depot.

Do not use v0.35 anymore, this was just a test to try some fixs: Results are WRONG.

This v0.36 got a very crappy video test, but at least it should works on all Amiga. Sorry about that, I don't actually have a lot of time. Have to wait a few days

Ah! My 3.3 Apollo is a 7455A@1.4 Ghz, that's explain the version number (UBOOT returns it to be 400 Mhz, but it runs 1400).

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@Crisot

Found a few differences in my system's results with this new version, for example L1 write cache seems much lower than before...

RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 733 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 5374 MB/Sec
WRITE: 370 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 305 MB/Sec
WRITE: 361 MB/Sec
WRITE: 978 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@Daniel

Yes this happens on 440, but I still don't understand what's the problem. Maybe it's related to something in my code going wrong with 440.

Unfortunately I don't have a Sam to test... I'll have a look at memory alignment.

My goal with this update was to have a working video test, for the Sam460. L1 speed fix in next version, I hope

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
A1-XE / Radeon 9000 / non-ECC RAM
SetA1 settings: FASTMEM FASTCAS R2C=2 R2A=1


RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: Motorola MPC 7447/7457 Apollo 1.2 @ 1000 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 7612 MB/Sec
WRITE: 2539 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 2291 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1991 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 248 MB/Sec
WRITE: 767 MB/Sec
WRITE: 801 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 29 MB/Sec
WRITE: 169 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Results from v0.36:

RAGEMEM v0.36 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC MPC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> L1 <---
READ: 9012 MB/Sec
WRITE: 8884 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ: 1061 MB/Sec
WRITE: 514 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ: 311 MB/Sec
WRITE: 514 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1237 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 61 MB/Sec
WRITE: 202 MB/Sec

Go to top
Re: ragemem benchmark results thread !
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@m3x

Not bad compared to the results from a Peg2 (below) which is considered the fastest OS4 machine.

*** L1 CPU cache (32KB buffer) ***
READ: 6534.77 MB/sec
WRITE: 2157.15 MB/sec

*** L2 CPU cache, if present (256KB buffer) ***
READ: 1989.89 MB/sec
WRITE: 1739.42 MB/sec

*** MEMORY (16MB buffer) ***
READ: 135.15 MB/sec
WRITE: 796.26 MB/sec

Philippe 'Elwood' FERRUCCI
Sam460ex 1.10 Ghz
http://elwoodb.free.fr
Go to top

  Register To Post
(1) 2 3 4 ... 8 »

 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2024 The XOOPS Project