ragemem benchmark results thread !

@Akiko

Cyberstorm PPC with 233MHz 604e, A4000, Mediator, Voodoo 3

(not sure why it picks it up as 235Mhz, but maybe slightly different cs ppc revision than yours). It's not overclocked.

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: 604e 9.4611 @ 235 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 469

---> L1 <---
READ32: 884 MB/Sec
READ64: 1767 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 740 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 1404 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 90 MB/Sec
READ64: 95 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 54 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 54 MB/Sec
WRITE: 87 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 6 MB/Sec
WRITE: 8 MB/Sec

@HammerD

Cyberstorm PPC with 366MHz 604e, A4000, Prometheus, Voodoo 3.

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: 604e 9.12546 @ 366 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 731

---> L1 <---
READ32: 1386 MB/Sec
READ64: 2769 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 1163 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 2209 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 98 MB/Sec
READ64: 98 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 56 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 56 MB/Sec
WRITE: 104 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 5 MB/Sec
WRITE: 7 MB/Sec

my v0.37 results:

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 799 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 128

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 1598

---> L1 <---
READ32: 2851 MB/Sec
READ64: 5661 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2864 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 5686 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 298 MB/Sec
READ64: 298 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 165 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 165 MB/Sec
WRITE: 890 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

@328gts

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 733 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 128

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 1465

---> L1 <---
READ32: 2697 MB/Sec
READ64: 5375 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 185 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 370 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 286 MB/Sec
READ64: 306 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 182 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 360 MB/Sec
WRITE: 985 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1166 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB - L3: none

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 2332

---> L1 <---
READ32: 4511 MB/Sec
READ64: 9011 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 4449 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 8882 MB/Sec

---> L2 <---
READ32: 1061 MB/Sec
READ64: 1061 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 521 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 520 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 311 MB/Sec
READ64: 310 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 521 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 521 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1251 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 72 MB/Sec
WRITE: 261 MB/Sec

@m3x

Excellent : nearly as fast in raw power than a G4 AmigaOne and 1.5 to 2x faster regarding Ram access (1.5x for Video Ram access).

Thanks for sharing !

@m3x

great news

the best is yet to come..

hope to see something new so

@afxgroup

Now I'll have to do a 3D benchmark to see how performs a 460

Numbers reported are interresting, now we have to see how it performs "in real life"

@afxgroup

I'm not sure I know what you mean but I think you're right!

@Crisot

the 460 ex is dmips = 2.0 x mhz according to applied micro :

http://www.appliedmicro.com/MyAMCC/js ... il.jsp?productID=PPC460EX


1166 MHZ x 2 = 2332 DMIPS, so are your numbers calculating Dhrystone MIPS :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhrystone

Graphics performance would be very interesting, especially bottlenecks and some way to compare performance to other systems.

http://www.mindcontrol.org/~hplus/graphics/ogl-perf.html

EDIT: the following cards are not mine but from other users in this Thread.


bppc/603e@330/256mb (70ns)

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: 603e 7.4609 @ 0 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 16 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 502

---> L1 <---
READ32: 724 MB/Sec
READ64: 1162 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 478 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 852 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 41 MB/Sec
READ64: 42 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 23 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 23 MB/Sec
WRITE: 45 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 5 MB/Sec
WRITE: 15 MB/Sec

NOTE:
Under morphos 1.4.5 w OS4Emu the results are pretty much the same except of MIPS (522) and VRAM write (22mb/sec).



RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: 604e 9.516 @ 233 Mhz

Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32

---CPU---
MAX MIPS: 465


---L1---

READ32: 882 MB/Sec
READ64: 1764 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 741 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 1408 MB/Sec


---RAM---

READ32: 90 MB/Sec
READ64: 94 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 53MB/Sec
WRITE64: 53MB/Sec
WRITE: 86 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---VIDEO BUS---

READ: 6 MB/Sec
WRITE 8MB/Sec


Cyberstorm vs Blizzard video bus interesting speed will post my card when i have time.

it also clear whats slowing down the Blizzard card which is no surprise.

@delshay

Nice scores for your blizzard PPC. Nice work.

on my 366MHz cyberstorm I put in a CVision PPC and got the following for video bus:

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 5 MB/Sec
WRITE: 18 MB/SEC

I tried changing the ram to 60ns but it basically made no difference in the test results, about 1MB/sec faster on the L1/L2 cache but that's it.

Prometheus going over Zorro gets lame write speeds (due to Zorro crap bus) ;)

But the Voodoo still feels a bit faster than CVision PPC...probably way fater gfx memory on-board and faster gfx chip than CVision PPC...

@HammerD

Quote:

its not my card its from other users in this thread. iv not yet posted my result but expect my card to be a lot faster due to very high PCI bus speed and should hold number one spot in the world for classic amiga PPC card.

you wiil need to compare your results with other Cyberstorm users.

My test

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 799 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 128

---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 1599

---> L1 <---
READ32: 2841 MB/Sec
READ64: 5636 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2852 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 5674 MB/Sec

---> RAM <---
READ32: 277 MB/Sec
READ64: 277 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 164 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 164 MB/Sec
WRITE: 895 MB/Sec (Tricky)

---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 14 MB/Sec
WRITE: 50 MB/Sec

@m3x

there is some SAM Flex (with the same MHz) that have different value in :

ex :
SAMO79
---> L1 <---
WRITE32: 2852 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 5674 MB/Sec

Daniel
---> L1 <---
WRITE32: 185 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 370 MB/Sec


Is there an explanation ?

@m3x

Nice results for the little beast!

@shadowsun

I think there is a bug in RageMem which prevents it to calculate the correct L1 cache speed on some systms (it gives approximately the same speed as the RAM's). The same bug occurs with the Sam460 if you check carefully.

Crisot : go back to work