BoingCube benchmark results

SAM460ex 1.15GHz and RadeonHD6570

#BoingCube -benchmark
*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Windowed NON-synced
Iterations: 689 frames
Duration: 10005 ms (10.005 seconds)
Rendering time: 679 ms (0.679 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 68.865567216392 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 1014.7275405007 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

#BoingCube -benchmark -gofullscreen
*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-synced
Iterations: 675 frames
Duration: 10006 ms (10.006 seconds)
Rendering time: 649 ms (0.649 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 67.459524285429 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 1040.061633282 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]


BTW if you iconify BC window and uniconify background image disappears (shows grey here).

@Raziel

Hi, now I understand perfectly

I repeated 1) and 2) at least 10 times, but BoingCube did not fail once, I can't reproduce the bug, sorry.

No idea what is really going on, but it might be your gfx-card (or your setup) unless more people can confirm the bug with different setups, or something else not sure... :S

I'll try "some tricks" in the comming updates to go around this bug, hopefully it will help.

Anyway, thanks Raziel for your time reporting the bug

@328gts

Quote:
Haha, you can get a heart attack for less trouble

Quote:
Yep, true that. I'll add some lines into readme about closing programs before benchmarking just to remind, thanks cheers

@jabirulo

Quote:
Outch, I can confirm that! Thanks for reporting

AmigaOne SE G3@666Mhz + Radeon 9000


*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Windowed NON-synced
Iterations: 573 frames
Duration: 10005 ms (10.005 seconds)
Rendering time: 1156 ms (1.156 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 57.271364317841 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 495.67474048443 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [


*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-synced
Iterations: 552 frames
Duration: 10006 ms (10.006 seconds)
Rendering time: 1158 ms (1.158 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 55.166899860084 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 476.68393782383 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Windowed NON-synced
Iterations: 192 frames
Duration: 10046 ms (10.046 seconds)
Rendering time: 1959 ms (1.959 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 19.112084411706 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 98.009188361409 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

The hollywoodplayer complains about incompatible screen pixel format for me when running fullscreen so i can't benchmark that on this machine.


A4000@200mhz and voodoo3

@smfQuote:
Thanks for reporting, I'll add a note about this in the readme.

Btw, nice to see the first result from an Amiga with a PPC card

@Marko

Here's the results from my aging but "used daily" A1-XE G4 with Radeon 9250.

6.System:Utilities/BoingCube> BoingCube -gofullscreen -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-synced
Iterations: 565 frames
Duration: 10006 ms (10.006 seconds)
Rendering time: 674 ms (0.674 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 56.466120327803 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 838.27893175074 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

6.System:Utilities/BoingCube> BoingCube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.20 (20151129)
Mode: Windowed NON-synced
Iterations: 575 frames
Duration: 10013 ms (10.013 seconds)
Rendering time: 697 ms (0.697 seconds) [lower is better]
Frame rate: 57.425347048837 FPS (frames/second)
Result: 824.96413199426 RFPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

Paul

@Paul

I have Radeon 9250 too, on my Sam440ep-flex 800MHz, my results here.

At what clock speed do you run your A1-XE?

#BoingCube -benchmark
*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 726 frames
Duration: 10005 ms (10.005 seconds)
Rendering time: 179 ms (0.179 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 72.56371814093 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 4055.8659217877 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]


*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark60 (Counts iterations per 60 seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 4237 frames
Duration: 60009 ms (60.009 seconds)
Rendering time: 991 ms (0.991 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 70.606075755303 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 4275.4793138244 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]



SAM460ex 1.150Hz & RadeonHD6570

Latest version on X1000 + 5450HD

> BoingCube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1587 frames
Duration: 10002 ms (10.002 seconds)
Rendering time: 258 ms (0.258 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 158.66826634673 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 6151.1627906977 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

> BoingCube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1585 frames
Duration: 10002 ms (10.002 seconds)
Rendering time: 271 ms (0.271 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 158.46830633873 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 5848.7084870849 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

v 1.30, X1000, HD 6670:

$ BoingCube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1523 frames
Duration: 10003 ms (10.003 seconds)
Rendering time: 199 ms (0.199 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 152.25432370289 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 7653.2663316583 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

$ BoingCube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1431 frames
Duration: 10002 ms (10.002 seconds)
Rendering time: 256 ms (0.256 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 143.07138572286 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 5589.84375 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

Edit: Hmm, when comparing to Severin's HD 5450, in fullscreen, why does mine have a faster rendering time (256 ms vs 271) but achieves fewer frames (1431 vs 1585) and hence a lower FPS (5590 vs 5849)?

And the same is - more or less - the case in windowed mode.

Best regards,

Niels

@nbache

Could it be the resolution you're using, especially for windowed mode as the gfx card still has to churn out the rest of the display?

I'm using 1920x1080x32

or morelikely something you have running in the background, I found quitting ibrowse mad a big difference...

I'll boot into a bare system and see what I get.

@nbache

ok, booting to bare workbench with everything in wbstart disabled:

> BoingCube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1612 frames
Duration: 10003 ms (10.003 seconds)
Rendering time: 241 ms (0.241 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 161.15165450365 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 6688.7966804979 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

> BoingCube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1609 frames
Duration: 10004 ms (10.004 seconds)
Rendering time: 215 ms (0.215 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 160.83566573371 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 7483.7209302326 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

Here's my results with version 1.30,
on Sam440ep-flex 800MHz Radeon 9250 with AOS4.1 FE.


1.> boingcube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 618 frames
Duration: 10011 ms (10.011 seconds)
Rendering time: 145 ms (0.145 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 61.732094695835 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 4262.0689655172 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

1.> boingcube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 563 frames
Duration: 10001 ms (10.001 seconds)
Rendering time: 186 ms (0.186 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 56.294370562944 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 3026.8817204301 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

1.> boingcube -benchmark -noaccgfx -noaccbuffer

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: OFF (software) Gfx: OFF (software)
Iterations: 556 frames
Duration: 10012 ms (10.012 seconds)
Rendering time: 819 ms (0.819 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 55.533359968038 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 678.87667887668 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

With 1.20 I got frame rate: 54, rendering frame rate: 624


The last one with -noaccgfx -noaccbuffer options is like the previous versions with "only" software graphics. Now hardware acc. graphics is used by default.

On X1000 1800MHz Radeon R9-270 with AOS4.1 FE.

boingcube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1613 frames
Duration: 10002 ms (10.002 seconds)
Rendering time: 161 ms (0.161 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 161.26774645071 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 10018.633540373 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

boingcube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1609 frames
Duration: 10003 ms (10.003 seconds)
Rendering time: 122 ms (0.122 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 160.85174447666 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 13188.524590164 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

boingcube -benchmark -noaccgfx -noaccbuffer

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: OFF (software) Gfx: OFF (software)
Iterations: 1583 frames
Duration: 10001 ms (10.001 seconds)
Rendering time: 513 ms (0.513 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 158.28417158284 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 3085.7699805068 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

@sundown

Holy smokes!!


Nice rig you got there

@Marko

Maybe the gfx card?

@Severin

Quote:Duh, yes, of course. Most likely both of the above.

My resolution is 2560×1600×32.

Here's a new set of results, where I have rebooted without running WBStartup:

$ BoingCube -benchmark

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Windowed NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1576 frames
Duration: 10013 ms (10.013 seconds)
Rendering time: 140 ms (0.14 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 157.3953859982 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 11257.142857143 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

$ BoingCube -benchmark -gofullscreen

*** BoingCube benchmark ***
Name: -benchmark10 (Counts iterations per ten seconds.)
Version: 1.30 (20151219)
Mode: Fullscreen NON-vsynced
Hardware acc.: Buff: ON (hardware) Gfx: ON (hardware)
Iterations: 1562 frames
Duration: 10004 ms (10.004 seconds)
Rendering time: 133 ms (0.133 seconds) [lower is better]
D. frame-rate: 156.13754498201 FPS (acquired displayed frames/second)
Result: 11744.360902256 FPS (rendering frame-rate) [higher is better]

Hmm, that's quite an improvement there. I guess the resolution isn't really a big factor compared to whatever I had running in the background (e.g. AmiDock, LimpidClock, Odyssey, just to mention a few that have graphics implications).

Best regards,

Niels

@Marko

v1.30
Occasional black window is gone - YAY!

What was it that produced the bug?