Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
58 user(s) are online (44 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 2
Guests: 56

LiveForIt, orgin, more...

Support us!

Headlines

 
  Register To PostTopic is Locked  

« 1 ... 3 4 5 (6)
Re: ACK proven untrustworthy
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@Rogue et al

Thanks for all the insights and techie background info

This "virtual environment" caught my eye, though.
Mind if i pesker you with a question?

Programs running in this environment are meant to be "old" programs (like a todays
build of ScummVM), written for the "not-memory-protected-kernel", aren?t they?
They?d still run, but "inside" this environment (which isn?t meant to be "bad" or "slower", isn?t it?).

For devs and porters (like me ... maybe ... one day) does that mean a matter of rewriting
the whole thing (devs) or simply rebuilding under the, then used, SDK (ports)?

Keep going, Rogue

Go to top
Re: ACK proven untrustworthy
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@ChrisH

Edit: Please continue that thread of discussion in private please.


Edited by orgin on 2007/8/24 18:04:46
For those who are brave enough to want to know me better, visit
my Home Page, my Storefront, and blogsey
Go to top
Re: ACK proven untrustworthy
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@Rogue

Any idea what kind of message-passing system the new Amiga OS will have? I hope that it won't require copying data into and out of a buffer, etc., but allow the memory involved to temporarily be shared with the target process.

The other thing I'm wondering about is how this would affect BOOPSI. BOOPSI passes data by reference all over the place. Could this be solved simply by having an intuition thread within a process, or will BOOPSI be deprecated too?

Hans

Go to top
Re: Anything but "ACK proven untrustworthy"
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Orgin

Oh, that's OK, there?s no need. Anyone who wants to know what I was on about can listen to my latest chat (070825, available on my web site; and recorded and uploaded before finding the moderator?s edit, so no, the two are not connected).

I'm actually rather surprised that the post stayed as long as it did, which in itself is a testimony against those who claim that the moderation is too tight here.

For those who are brave enough to want to know me better, visit
my Home Page, my Storefront, and blogsey
Go to top
Re: Anything but "ACK proven untrustworthy"
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Billsey

Quote:

Billsey wrote:
@Orgin

I'm actually rather surprised that the post stayed as long as it did, which in itself is a testimony against those who claim that the moderation is too tight here.


Why did you post it at all when you were expecting that it would be deleted? Sorry, but I don't see any logic in it.

Go to top
Re: Anything but "ACK proven untrustworthy"
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Helge

In my case, that would have been 20/20 hind sight?you can?t expect hind sight in advance. :-/

For those who are brave enough to want to know me better, visit
my Home Page, my Storefront, and blogsey
Go to top
Re: Anything but "ACK proven untrustworthy"
Supreme Council
Supreme Council


See User information
Thread locked since it's just become an off topic free for all thread without end.

If you need to discuss any matters as a result of this thread then start another thread in the appropriate forum.

Vacca foeda. Sum, ergo edo

Mr Bobo Cornwater
Go to top

  Register To PostTopic is Locked
« 1 ... 3 4 5 (6)

 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2024 The XOOPS Project