SFS (68k) and recycled dir

	Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic
Register To Post

« 1 (2)

joerg

Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir

Posted on: 2008/3/24 17:56 #21

Just can't stay away

@Framiga

Quote:

btw ... do you thik is a good idea using SFS with a slighty larger blocksise (1024-2048) for HD recording? (still without .recycled)

No.

Slayer

Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir

Posted on: 2008/4/12 6:55 #22

Quite a regular

always been one to have larger buffers... then again I always ensured my Amigas have ample memory too...

my OS4 classic for example has 1024 buffers on all 5 partitions and the AmigaOne has 2048 on all 6

don't settle for anything less... I tell ya! lol

salass00

Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir

Posted on: 2008/4/12 8:10 #23

Just can't stay away

@Framiga

Quote:

lol! you have "problems" with half gig of RAM? i can't beleive!!!

Not really all that hard to believe. Some large programs can require 512 MB RAM or more to compile, especially if optimisations are enabled.

F.e. while I still only had 256 MB I wasn't able to compile flite-1.2 even with -O0 (no optimisations). With 512 MB I can compile all of flite-1.2 except for the 48kHz voice, which still requires too much RAM.

Also for one of my TuneNet plugins (GSF IIRC) I had to use -O0 on one of the source files or it would try to allocate about 700 MB of RAM, which of course would fail.

Framiga

Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir

Posted on: 2008/4/12 16:00 #24

Just popping in

@salass00

and the 3-4 MB needed to achieve a suitable SFS configuration, could change what?

daxb

Re: SFS (68k) and recycled dir

Posted on: 2008/5/23 15:50 #25

Just popping in

@Framiga
Quote:

have you always used HDInstTools for ALL partitions on that HD?

Sorry for the very late reply (forgot this forum). Yes I allways used HDInstTools.

Register To Post	« 1 (2)
	Top Previous Topic Next Topic

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )