Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
100 user(s) are online (94 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 0
Guests: 100

more...

Support us!

Headlines

 
  Register To Post  

« 1 2 (3)
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@salas00

very well done !!! It works : I can use NTFileSystem on my IDE device without any problem !!!!

Back to a quiet home... At last
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Excellent you got it working too!

interesting, it doesn't work in write-mode by chance this way?

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
No way it could write because its author did not write the corresponding code !

However I find quite strange it's working using USB without any patch.

Back to a quiet home... At last
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Check this screenshot of NTFS if you don't believe me...

It's a Lacie Mobile 2.5 USB box, installed with a 10GB drive formatted just an hour ago in WinXP as NTFS. Then connected to my A1 frontpanel USB. Using giggledisk to find HIGH CYL as seen in screenshot,edited the mountfile as seen and mounted it with c:mount!

And it works!

Check grab...

www.haymigga.dk/ntfs_os4.png

just noticed that the 4.5GB debian ISO files are show as only 2GB, i guess this is Opus fault? or?

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@abalaban

Quote:
However I find quite strange it's working using USB without any patch.

The Sirion USB stack used in AmigaOS4 is, or at least was, available for AmigaOS 3.x as well and supported the obsolete TD64 commands for AmigaOS <= 3.1, but it was forgotten to disable them in the AmigaOS4 version. This bug was fixed a long time ago already in the AmigaOS4 version, but it seems it wasn't yet in the version included in Update4.

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@abalaban

Thanks for testing this and reporting back. Since it works I think I can remove the untested alpha warning and do an upload to OS4Depot too.

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Supreme Council
Supreme Council


See User information

Vacca foeda. Sum, ergo edo

Mr Bobo Cornwater
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@all

I have actively used and *read* a working NTFS Windows 2000 professional setup Harddisk using the NTFileSystem module from Aminet...

this was done on an AMIthlon setup

as for filesystem limitations... there are some quirks...

may be something to do with 32bit vs 64bit block addressing
for the filesystem...to with maximum HDD sizing and filesize limits

I think AFFS and FAT32 share the file size limit for the 32bit restricted versions...

I know I have had a larger filesize than that stored on SFS and NTFS between various setups

now I will go back to scrimping and saving for a Samantha
so I can put together some kind of development machine

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@haymigga

I did not say I wasn't believing you, because I do believe you. Just I was finding it quite strange, but joerg stated what I was guessing from the begining : the USB device was supporting both NSD and TD64... At least until update 4 (means, you'll have to use the Salass00's patch with the next OS4 version...)

@Salass00

I've been using it for more than 1hour and a half yesterday to listen to MP3's to have a frequent read access and I did not experienced a single quirk Well done !

Back to a quiet home... At last
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Amigans Defender
Amigans Defender


See User information
fantastic work!

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
Well, I have added TD64 to experimental versions of my drivers, for who'd like to test those filesystems without the patch.

It would probably require a pretty uptodate system though (like the current betatester's installation).

Regards,
--
St?phane

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Amigans Defender
Amigans Defender


See User information
@ sg2
welcome to amigans good to see you here

Amiga is the heart and soul of computing nothing else comes close
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
abalaban: i like people believing in me ;)

I'will probably try this method of yours soon as well, one thing you could check is perhaps whether the display of my 4.5GB ISO's as 2.0GB in both AOS4 + DIR-OPUS has something to do with L:NTFSfilesystem or my OS4 installation?

edit: i guess this is some 32/64 bit limitation...so using TD64 will solve it?

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@haymigga

Quote:

edit: i guess this is some 32/64 bit limitation...so using TD64 will solve it?


No. TD64 is just for the lowlevel device i/o, it knows nothing about files or directories itself. If there is a problem with big files then this needs to be fixed in the filesystem itself because that's where it is.

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@Salass00

but maybe this is also DOpus that limits itself to display file size to 2GB ? Don't know I don't have such big files at hand, nor I have a known supporting Filesystem (SFS2 for example) to test DOpus display...

Someone with the SFS2, a >2GB file and able to test which size DOpus reports ??

Back to a quiet home... At last
Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@Salass00

very good job, I used it with ext2 filesystem from
my linux HD and it worked great.

Many thanks.

Regards,
Paolo

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just can't stay away
Just can't stay away


See User information
@abalaban

I missed that part of what he wrote (i.e. about using DOpus) but now you mention it I'd say it's likely part of the problem.

Anyway on OS3.x there isn't really any good way to find out the size of file that is bigger than 4GB. Seek()ing to the end of the file and back again doesn't work because the position you get is a 32-bit integer. ExamineFH() doesn't work either since the size field is also only 32-bit.

On OS4 there is GetFileSize() which returns the size of a file as 64-bit integer, and of course Change/GetFilePosition(), which are more or less 64-bit equivalents of the Seek() command.

The underlying filesystem will of course have to support the relevant 64-bit packets also for these to work...

In this case when 2GB+ files all show up as 2GB probably the filesystem is simply putting the biggest number that it can fit into a signed 32-bit. Probably a good idea too since a lot of programs will likely treat the filesize as signed.

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
I have added TD64 support in the drivers, and am now waiting for a betatester to confirm you can now directly use those filesystems.

Regards,
--
St?phane

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Just popping in
Just popping in


See User information
@sg2

Any feedback?

@abalaban

is reading NTFS drives still working for you fine under OS4 final?

I tried to get it to work on IDE port today, but no luck. Perhaps you could give a hint?

Go to top
Re: NTFSFileSystem and FATFileSystem on OS4 ?
Quite a regular
Quite a regular


See User information
@haymigga

first I launch the TD64patch (in the user-sequence) with something like this :
Quote:
RUN <>C:TD64patch a1ide.device 1

a1ide.device is the device to patch (here internal A1 ide),
1 refers to the fact that I choosed to only patch the device for the unit I'll use for NTFS and that my PC HD is slave on the first port.

Then once it's okay I double click on the mountlist I defined using giggledisk (from the NTFS archive).

An it just worked.

Back to a quiet home... At last
Go to top

  Register To Post
« 1 2 (3)

 




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 ( 0 members and 2 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2024 The XOOPS Project