Login
Username:

Password:

Remember me



Lost Password?

Register now!

Sections

Who's Online
78 user(s) are online (70 user(s) are browsing Forums)

Members: 1
Guests: 77

BSzili, more...

Support us!
Donate

Headlines
Recent files - OS4Depot - Your one stop for AmigaOS4 files

 
Jump to the bottom of the page Bottom    View previous topic Previous Topic    View next topic Next Topic

  Register To Post  

« 1 (2)
328gts
Re: why do people think TimberWolf will be 'sluggish' on anything other than X1000 ?
Posted on: 2010/6/11 4:14    #21
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
Quote:

DAX wrote:
To answer the topic question (now that TWAlpha 1 is out) the answer is: it won't! (be sluggish I mean).
On my Sam, even redrawing everything from 2 to 8 times (plus other missing optimizations) it is still as fast as OWB in most cases and in some other it is mind blowingly faster!
Yes I know OWB has some technical problems right now with ign.com, but even when that site worked fine, it wasnt half as fast and all this on what's supposed to be a "very slow" early Alpha.

So bottom line, it won't be sluggish at all, and it will actually go faster than Debian Firefox when running the latter on same HW (Sam in this case).


yes I confirmed this for myself as well and a great relief it was to find out too

@ Rogue

don't worry my friend, we won't hold you to any exact speed comparison here at amigans...though no promises for people elsewhere

now if only my USB stuff that worked so fine under Update 1 would magically work under Update 2 I would be in Amiga bliss..ok and also USB2.0 too


Edited by Rigo on 2010/6/13 8:57:41
_______________________________
c64-dual sids, A1000, A1200-060@50, A4000-CSMKIII
Catweasel MK4+= Amazing
! My Master Miggies-Amiga1000 & AmigaONE X1000 !
mancave-ramblings
Go to top
Raziel
Re: why do people think TimberWolf will be 'sluggish' on anything other than X1000 ?
Posted on: 2010/6/11 11:55    #22
Home away from home
Home away from home


See User information
@all

It already runs great and fast on my AOne...my, my, my, just imagine with all the optimizations implemented?
It will fly i tells ya



Thanks a lot for the effort to the bros
--

game box/art scans
scummvm infrequent builds
Go to top
ssolie
Re: why do people think TimberWolf will be 'sluggish' on anything other than X1000 ?
Posted on: 2010/6/13 4:34    #23
Amigans Defender
Amigans Defender


See User information
@Raziel
It was a whole bunch of worry for nothing.

ExecSG Team Lead
Go to top
Troels
Re: why do people think TimberWolf will be 'sluggish' on anything other than X1000 ?
Posted on: 2010/6/13 8:49    #24
Not too shy to talk
Not too shy to talk


See User information
@ssolie
Exactly, never saw why people worried to much about speed. FF runs great on my older pc's, even those with similar speeds to the SAM. Startup takes some time and really Javascript heavy sites can be a bit slow but apart from that it just works as long as the computer has enough memory.

I am really looking forward to see further optimizations, it's not to far from being able to replace OWB

@ALL
I can see Timberwolf almost reached 500 dls. on OS4depot.net. Remember that if you like what you see in the alpha release and wants to show your appreciation to the Friedens, you can still make a donation via Amigabounty.net Project Timberwolf Thanks for the support of the project.
Bounty site for AmigaOS4! www.amigabounty.net
Go to top
Anonymous
Re: why do people think TimberWolf will be 'sluggish' on anything other than X1000 ?
   #25
@DAX

Quote:

To answer the topic question (now that TWAlpha 1 is out) the answer is: it won't! (be sluggish I mean).
On my Sam, even redrawing everything from 2 to 8 times (plus other missing optimizations) it is still as fast as OWB in most cases and in some other it is mind blowingly faster!


Not here. Perhaps you use a peculiar subset of sites.
Go to top

  Register To Post
« 1 (2)

 
Jump to the top of the page Top    View previous topic Previous Topic    View next topic Next Topic




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 ( 0 members and 1 Anonymous Users )




Powered by XOOPS 2.0 © 2001-2024 The XOOPS Project