This adds a potentially missing overloaded function, no idea if this is the cause but it's the only thing I can see which might be wrong (without access to QtWebKit).
I doubt it will make any difference because I assume my plugin is saying it can handle the format (otherwise it would fail over to a different plugin), and then not returning the decoded data.
Seems that ctorrent has been abandoned. No update for ages. So i won't make new versions. Lost interest in it. I'm trying to find an alternative. So if you find one thats easy to port i might give it a try.
QtWeb will be a wonderful browser as is (and I hope it will be fast aswell) once Alfkil will complete at 100% his QT integration, personally i'm just waiting for the new QT beta WIP to test.
I have the feeling that this release in development will be a milestone
I haven't been working on libQtWebKit for a while now, I ran into some problems that I was not able to solve immediately. In any case, I don't think that having QtWebKit is going to be of much help, I doubt that it will be able to outperform OWB or Timberwolf.
@spotUP
The network module works sort of, although there seems to be a problem with datagrams (I'm not too much into networking myself, so this is as specific as I can get). Also I cannot seem to get any signals from the sockets, so I have made a hack, where active sockets start a timer to drive input events (= bad).
I haven't been working on libQtWebKit for a while now, I ran into some problems that I was not able to solve immediately. In any case, I don't think that having QtWebKit is going to be of much help, I doubt that it will be able to outperform OWB or Timberwolf.
Well .. yep altrough still one of the most interesting QT project out there and it could be a also real program test for our current QT framework, right now we mostly tested demos and little apps
Maybe can you release an alpha version as is just for heavy tester freaks around
BTW: Thanks a lot for the mail, beta downloading in progress
Alfkil, maybe olaf could help out with the network module? I am mostly interested in porting network related apps, that's why i so concerned about this part. Ofcourse, sound would be awesome too. Maybe you could let someone in on the sound part?
Salass00 should know a thing or two about sound me thinks.
alfkil wrote: I haven't been working on libQtWebKit for a while now, I ran into some problems that I was not able to solve immediately. In any case, I don't think that having QtWebKit is going to be of much help, I doubt that it will be able to outperform OWB or Timberwolf.
I would definitely agree wrt performance. However, some programs depend on libQtWebKit so it would definitely be useful to have.
News feed
OS4 Feedback forum
OS4Depot Feedback forum
Amigabounty forum
OpenAmiga forum
AmiCygnix forum
ABC shell forum
AmiKit forum
Cinnamon Writer forum
CodeBench forum
Digital Universe forum
Dopus 5 forum
E-UAE forum
Gnash forum
Ibrowse forum
JAmiga forum
Odyssey forum
OWB forum
Qt forum
SmartFileSystem forum
Timberwolf forum
TouchDevice forum
TuneNet forum
Unsatisfactory Software forum
Donate
