Good question. I saw the price difference between that two and I'm not sure whether the difference really fits to the performance difference or not. I would pick the 6570.
Having tested over a dozen cards from the 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx and 7xxxx Radeon HD range my current favourites are:-
the passively cooled Sapphire HD5670, the half-height, single slot Sapphire HD6570 and the passively cooled Sapphire HD7750. These cards deliver a good balance between power, performance and noise level (i.e. no noise with the two passively cooled cards). In addition the HD5670 and HD6570 cards are both compatible with the most recent Linux kernel created by Darren Stevens, which is a nice little bonus. The two passively cooled cards take up more space but the HD5670, due to its form factor, does not use a second slot.
The 6850 is also a nice single slot card but does include an additional cooling fan.
LiveForIt wrote: I guess 6450 card is useless for 3D.
A 6450 can do 3D; just don't expect much performance-wise. I've said it often enough, the low-end of each series really is low-end. They're designed to be cheap, low-power, and low performance. Since you are interested in 3D stuff, this the low-end cards are probably not right for you.
The cards that Trevor listed are probably the best bet for most people, particularly those who are unsure what to get.
High-end cards (e.g., Radeon HD 6850, 7850 or better) are for those into heavy gaming and graphics-intensive stuff. ** Anyone in this category probably already knows what they want.
Hans
** Yes, I expect developers to get to work bringing new stuff to AmigaOS once MESA + Gallium3D is released, including software that brings the cards to their limits.
I chose 6570 for myself. I'm not into deep 3D stuff anyway, I just wanted to have a good performance for daily use. I hope that this card will do the job just fine.
To Be A True Adventurer, You Ought To Play Real Text Adventures
I also chose the 6570 and even though it has a fan it is very very quiet, and small. I just wish for overlay to speed up video playback which I find disappointingly slow. I expected the X1000 to be at least %400 as fast for video playback due to faster CPU and MUCH faster RAM, but I'd say it's only 50% faster than the XE G4/933, which means it can't do 720p h264
Software developer for Amiga OS3 and OS4. Develops for OnyxSoft and the Amiga using E and C and occasionally C++
LiveForIt wrote: I just checked my e-mail yesterday, I guess what I found a e-mail from AmigaKit,
but what graphic card to buy? 6570 or 6870? what should I buy.
I guess 6450 card is useless for 3D.
For modern 3D maybe, but I ran OpenAreana on one at 900x1600 and got 50+ frames a second. As Hans has said these are very low end, but also several generations later than the cards we are used to. The 6450 f.e. is about 2x faster than a top end 9200 series card. A 6870 is 10x the performance of a 6450.
The 6570 is nice BTW, single slot and quite quiet. I expect the 6870 is a dual-slot monster.
As always with graphics cards, buy what you can afford/live with.
Is the onboard sound useable or will there be a soundcard fitted? Same question but for Ethernet (i think it was Ethernet which was lacking drivers back then)
What kind of cards can one plug in the 33MHz PCI slots?
I did that in beginning of April and got an email in June telling me I was registered as interested in ordering the next batch of AmigaOne X1000.
Now I haven´t heard anything and I sent another email to Amigakit for more than a week ago but no answer at all. Nothing not even a reply as they are busy.
Still want to buy the X1000 but I just wonder how much I have to do to get a reply from Amigakit.
We have been processing and shipping X1000 orders since January of this year. We are working down the customer list, so if you received a confirmation email from us, we will contact you in due course when we reach your position in the list.
PMail if you want me to check your status on the list.