Does anyone have the linux hosted cross-compilers?

@kas1e and @Capehill

The odd thing is, when I build and use these compilers from adtools (Ubuntu 12.04 64bit in VirtualBox) to build ffmpeg with altivec support, they all produce faulty video and audio output. Non-altivec builds are OK.

I can't find the adtools 20090118 source used for zerohero's cross-compiler and the OS4 SDK anywhere.

I'm trying to find the root cause of the altivec builds of ffmpeg being faulty. I've tracked it down to being an issue with the compilers I've personally built from adtools, but I don't know if it's an issue with gcc 4.6.3 in Ubuntu (which is used to compile the cross-compiler), or VirtualBox, the adtools branch, or something else.

@all
Zerohero's pages are up again, but just in case i save all the files and put on my mirror.

Only 3 files are missing and which says not-found even on original page now (os3 related):

http://cross.zerohero.se/ppc-linux/m6 ... aos-binutils-2.14.tar.bz2
http://cross.zerohero.se/ppc-linux/m68k-amigaos-gcc-2.95.3.tar.bz2
http://cross.zerohero.se/ppc-linux/m68k-amigaos-gcc-3.4.0.tar.bz2

If anyone have them, plz share.

All others are backed up.

@Mick

Write BZ on adtools or we can't end up with some new sdk where altivec bins sucked.

I wasn't sure what "BZ" meant for a sec there. I assume it's Bugzilla? I don't think Sourceforge uses that.

I'm not convinced it's an adtools issue. It might be an issue with the compiler that is used to build adtools. ssolie suggested that it might be the compile switches used (-maltivec -mabi=altivec etc.), but I would have assumed that if only those 2 switches is needed and works on 4.2.4 (adtools 20090118), it'd work the 4.2.4 I built (which is 20100512).

So, I won't do a bug report unless I'm sure of what the bug is. adtools could be fine.

Edit: I found 20090118 in revision 235.

@MickJT
Quote:
Thanks for mentioning this work-around. I may not end-up using it, but it's useful to have a backup solution...