It feels quicker than Qt4 (on Windows at least). This will definitely make the app I'm developing way easier to release on the Amiga as I'd already converted all of the signal/slot to the new style
ChrisH wrote: Now the stupid question: What can we do with Qt5, that we couldn't be Qt4.7 ? (I know it's more modern, but what needs it?)
Everybody writing open source stuff using Qt seems to be migrating to it. Apparently it's structured better so the platform dependent bits are easy to maintain through updates, so Qt 5.1 etc should be a doddle and we can stay up-to-date.
@alfkil - Please can you ensure it is possible to install Qt5 alongside Qt 4.7.
Apparently most of the system specific stuff has been located in plugins, and so I can pretty much build anything I like in the whole package, but of course I can't run anything, because I haven't done the amiga specific plugins. Everything seems nicely located, but I bet there are some caveats comming up. Should be possible to do before Christmas, though (fingers crossed, not forgetting to never promise anything before the bear has been located, shot, cut into pieces and eaten...).
Alfkil, take your time, it's not a Grand Prix! The important is the final result, not the timeline and i'm sure you will got the best result without any internal or external pression
Meantime we can continue our testing on the current 4.7.0, there are so many great things to test and use that we can enjoy it for years !
Just a curiosity: what version of "Qt5" are you porting right now ?
Recently, at the end of August a new 5.1.1 was released and according to the comment worldwide it seems pretty stable release
Yes, as Samir said, take your time. We still have a lot of things to do or port with the 4.7
What about the bugs on 4.7, will you continue to release QuickFix or will you wait for Qt5 to fix all little problems that we are discovering in the beta-test thread ?
Of course I will continue to produce quickfixes for Qt4.7 as issues come in and as time allows. If there is some pressing issue, please be a little persistent about it, since I tend to forget what has been written at what time etc. I still have a list that samo79 has written, but there might of course be other things in orbit.
@Chris
I could simply make Qt5 reference a qt5: assign instead of qt:. That should be easy to do.