|
Author | Thread |
---|---|
ktadd |
Published: 2010/7/8 16:58 Updated:
2010/7/8 16:58
|
Quite a regular
Joined: 12/06/2006
From: California, Unitied States
Comments: 676
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
Thanks for this new release.
Note that the current version of ffmpGUI on OS4Depot does not work with this version of ffmpeg. I have an updated version that works with ffmpeg 0.6 that I will release soon. A couple notes about ffmpeg 0.6 that I noticed from my testing. The new codecs, with the exception of subtitles, are decode only so you can read them but not save them. The one codec that is not supported for encoding in ffmpeg 0.6 that is supported by the older version is arm_wb (Adaptive Multi-Rate NarrowBand). As a result I've modified the arm_wb audio codec setting to encode in arm_nb when using ffmpeg 0.6. This souldn't be a big problem but if you want to encode in arm_wb, you should continue to use the older version of ffmpeg. (MickJT, please let us know if this has changed since the last verion you sent me.) When released ffmpegGUI will continue to support the older version SVN-r16701 as well as version 0.6. Thanks again for this new release. |
MickJT |
Published: 2010/7/8 17:05 Updated:
2010/7/8 17:12
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 04/28/2009
From: Adelaide, Australia
Comments: 1019
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
You mean wide-band, not narrow-band.
No change in that department since the versions you've tested. From www.ffmpeg.org "Support for AMR-WB encoding has been removed since libopencore-amr does not support it" |
ChrisH |
Published: 2010/7/8 21:08 Updated:
2010/7/8 21:22
|
Home away from home
Joined: 05/19/2007
From: England
Comments: 3582
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
FFplay sounds very interesting & I will try ASAP. Hope the "fast CPU" doesn't indicate it's slow/unoptimised.
EDIT: Oh dear, it is slow, at least compared to MPlayer. And it doesn't seem any more compatible with MP4s or MKVs than MPlayer |
MickJT |
Published: 2010/7/9 8:07 Updated:
2010/7/9 8:07
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 04/28/2009
From: Adelaide, Australia
Comments: 1019
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
FFplay doesn't use OpenGL. MPlayer is much better.
|
spotUP |
Published: 2010/7/9 17:21 Updated:
2010/7/9 17:21
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 11/26/2006
From:
Comments: 1492
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
with libffmpeg, we have all deps needed to port:
digiband (rhytm game) http://www.happypenguin.org/show?DigiBand deadbeef musicplayer: http://deadbeef.sourceforge.net/ flv2mpeg4 http://www.freshports.org/multimedia/flv2mpeg4/ sox, audio converter http://sourceforge.net/projects/sox/files/ |
MickJT |
Published: 2010/7/9 17:57 Updated:
2010/7/10 11:40
|
Just can't stay away
Joined: 04/28/2009
From: Adelaide, Australia
Comments: 1019
|
Re: FFmpeg 0.6 released for OS4
You know the funny thing about ffmpeg, is i've compared the output in config.mak (and other generated files when configuring) when enabling shared libraries, compared to just static ones.
There's no difference at all except -fPIC, and -DPIC in some places. Except ffmpeg/ffplay do not work when using shared libraries. It's libavutil, it crashes on av_get_bits_per_pixel and I have no bloody idea why! So, anything that needs to use libffmpeg (well, libavutil) is gonna have to be statically linked, which is a real bummer. I guess it's possible to compile the other libraries without specifying libavutil as a dependency, and then statically link libavutil. I will look into it. It'll be even more interesting if that actually works. Edit: Didn't work. Also, I think ffplay will work on OS4.0 seeing as it doesn't use MiniGL. It's the combination of the latest SDL and a MiniGL under 2.2 that don't work together. |